“$30 property tax appeal fee is dead” plus 3 more |
- $30 property tax appeal fee is dead
- New property tax to catch more houses in its web
- Property tax for NSW
- New property tax gets mixed reviews
$30 property tax appeal fee is dead Posted: 13 May 2010 01:10 PM PDT The proposed $30 fee to appeal property tax assessments is dead — at least for now. Darlene Bloom, Orange County clerk of the Board of Supervisors, said she has "deleted" her proposal from the board's May 25 agenda after Realtors reacted negatively to the idea. Bloom had proposed the $30 appeal fee to help offset the cost of processing and scheduling appeals hearings and to discourage frivolous and fraudulent claims. Bloom estimated that 40% of property owners who appeal their taxes either withdraw their appeals or fail to show up for scheduled hearings, inflating the county's costs. Her action came as other counties around the state are considering similar proposals and after the number of appeals nearly tripled. Currently, it's free to fight one's property taxes. However, property owners who have gone through appeals, readers and, ultimately, the Orange County Association of Realtors opposed the fee. Some property owners complained that they shouldn't have to pay to correct the county assessor's errors. "I just don't think now is the time to go forward (with the proposal)," Bloom said after withdrawing her measure. She said, however, she may resubmit the idea in the future. She wants to see how other counties handle the matter and wait until after a vacancy on the Board of Supervisors is filled. . According to Bloom and to a county staff report, at least a dozen California counties are considering appeals fees and two counties recently adopted fees for their own taxpayers. Marin County adopted a $50 fee and Merced County adopted a $30 fee, she said. "I still believe in it," Bloom said of the fee. "But now is not the time." Around 20,000 property owners appealed their taxes this year in the face of falling real estate values. County officials estimate that local property owners file between 5,500 to 9,000 appeals in normal years. The Board of Supervisors were to consider the measure at it's May 4 meeting, but Bloom postponed the measure after the Orange County Association of Realtors requested a meeting to learn more about it. Following that meeting, Jean Tietgen, association president-elect, issued a statement expressing skepticism about the need for the appeals fee. "We remain skeptical that this fee is warranted at this time as homeowners are also struggling to keep their homes," the statement said. "A tax reduction may be one way of helping them stay in their home and, short of the state cutting property taxes or the assessor doing an across-the-board reduction in values, the appeals process is the only way for a homeowner to do it themselves." . . Five Filters featured article: The Art of Looking Prime Ministerial - The 2010 UK General Election. Available tools: PDF Newspaper, Full Text RSS, Term Extraction. |
New property tax to catch more houses in its web Posted: 13 May 2010 10:13 AM PDT THE number of home buyers paying the state government's new property tax is forecast to soar beyond estimates and significantly increase the revenue flowing to the government, unless the Treasurer, Eric Roozendaal, moves to index the $500,000 threshold. The Lands Minister, Tony Kelly, revealed yesterday that, only three weeks before the budget, the government had yet to discuss whether the threshold would be indexed to prevent increasing numbers of property sales incurring the extra tax as prices increased. ''We haven't discussed that yet,'' he admitted. ''That's certainly something that was raised with me this morning. I'll certainly be raising that with the Treasurer.'' The government insists the tax will affect only 30 per cent of property transactions in NSW. However the median house price in Sydney - $600,000 - is forecast to rise as high as $1 million within a decade. Mr Kelly acknowledged that revenue surplus to the stated purpose of the tax - to combat fraud in property documentation and underwrite payouts to victims of fraudulent transactions - would flow to consolidated revenue. Last night the Opposition Leader, Barry O'Farrell, committed to opposing the tax and repealing it if elected to government. The opposition accusing the government of lying about the reasons for the tax, arguing that it was a revenue-raising measure. The tax is expected to raise $90 million a year by imposing a 0.2 per cent levy on the portion of residential and commercial property sales between $500,000 and $1 million and 0.25 per cent on the portion above $1 million. While Mr Kelly has said revenue from the tax would fund the new anti-fraud features such as watermarks and security seals on property documents, the opposition has pointed out that the measures were introduced last June. Mr Kelly yesterday sought to change the focus of the tax to funding the Torrens Assurance Fund, which insures property holders in NSW against document fraud on their property for the time they own it. The current charge of $190 covers the administration of the fund, Mr Kelly said, and the new tax was needed to adequately fund its potential liabilities. He said there were 35 fraud matters being investigated by NSW Police, for which the fund's exposure would be $20 million. The opposition also pointed out that a charge of $4 is already levied on property transactions to cover fraud and error. Mr Kelly's spokesman said the charge had raised $2.7 million last financial year, whereas more than $4 million had been paid out. Another developer group, the Urban Development Institute of Australia, added its voice to the criticism yesterday. Its NSW chief executive, Stephen Albin, said the tax threatened the recovery of the NSW housing market. ''Sydney is already suffering from a lack of housing supply because developers aren't acquiring land to bring to market because the process is too costly and too risky,'' he said. ''This new tax will only exacerbate that problem." Five Filters featured article: The Art of Looking Prime Ministerial - The 2010 UK General Election. Available tools: PDF Newspaper, Full Text RSS, Term Extraction. |
Posted: 13 May 2010 06:02 AM PDT A 'monster' new property tax slipped before the NSW parliament will only hurt home buyers and depress the market, the opposition says. The tax, which was quietly announced by Lands Minister Tony Kelly on Wednesday, will apply to property selling for more than $500,000, adding $200 to fees for an average Sydney purchase, and $1000 for a home costing $1 million. Mr Kelly explained the fee was part of a strategy to prevent property fraud. But Opposition Leader Barry O'Farrell has dismissed it as 'an excuse for a monster new property tax', saying it will hurt home buyers and depress the market. 'We've just started to see what Eric Roozendaal would call some 'green shoots', some signs that the property market of NSW is recovering, and what does the state government do? 'The state government slaps another tax on that is going to hurt the market,' Mr O'Farrell told Macquarie Radio on Thursday. 'For people trying to get into the housing market, for people trying to trade homes, it's just going to make it harder for them at a time when they are already getting a kick in the guts because of interest rate rises and increase in mortgage payments,' he said. The Real Estate Institute of NSW described the fee as a tax on the 'mortgage heartland' of NSW. 'Of the 50 local government areas in Sydney, 34 have average house prices in excess of $500,000,' the institute's president Wayne Stewart said in a statement. 'That means in hundreds of suburbs across Sydney alone, home buyers will get hit with additional fees of anywhere between $200 and $1000 for properties valued up to $1 million. 'What we are seeing here is the Keneally government trying to claw back the GST handed back to the commonwealth for hospitals the only way it can - by hitting property owners hard and fast.' Premier Kristina Keneally defended the new tax in parliament on Wednesday, saying 70 per cent of property transactions would be unaffected. Five Filters featured article: The Art of Looking Prime Ministerial - The 2010 UK General Election. Available tools: PDF Newspaper, Full Text RSS, Term Extraction. |
New property tax gets mixed reviews Posted: 13 May 2010 11:38 AM PDT
A new tax on home buyers could deter investors and tighten the Illawarra rental squeeze, a property group has warned. But Illawarra MPs have thrown their support behind the plan, promising it an easy passage through Parliament. Illawarra Real Estate Institute chair Charles Hegyi has hit out at State Government plans to introduce a new land transfer charge on property sales of more than $500,000, which Lands Minister Tony Kelly says will fund measures to reduce property fraud. "The existing land tax is already ridiculous; this will make it harder again to get investors into the market," Mr Hegyi said. "The rental crisis will continue until the Government wakes up and realises it has to address investors again." The latest data from the Real Estate Institute of NSW shows the Illawarra rental vacancy rate hit 1.5 per cent in January. Mr Hegyi said rather than impose a new charge, the State Government should raise the threshold of existing land tax or abolish it completely. But Illawarra MPs have shown their support for the tax, which will reportedly rake in $90 million annually. Kiama MP Matt Brown said the tax would help pay for infrastructure and services and property fraud. "I don't think (the tax) will deter investment … it still makes NSW charges significantly less than most other states," Mr Brown said. The tax represented a relatively small impost on large investments, he said. Minister for the Illawarra Paul McLeay said around 70 per cent of property registrations would be exempt from the tax, with median house prices routinely falling below $500,000. Wollongong MP Noreen Hay rejected Opposition criticism that the announcement was timed to coincide with the federal budget aftermath. "The minister ... brought the public announcement forward so as not to be lost within the upcoming NSW budget."
Five Filters featured article: The Art of Looking Prime Ministerial - The 2010 UK General Election. Available tools: PDF Newspaper, Full Text RSS, Term Extraction. |
You are subscribed to email updates from Yahoo! News Search Results for property tax To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
0 comments:
Post a Comment